Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 03:04

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Oracle Stock Jumps On Earnings Beat, Upbeat Cloud Growth Forecast - Investor's Business Daily
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is there electric light therapy tested and proven science?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Brain-region stimulation may ease motor symptoms, study finds - Parkinson's News Today
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is the best sunscreen recommended by dermatologists in India for oily skin?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Do you realize people believe that story about Taylor Swift? Do you not say it is satire?